In a pivotal ruling on Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Percy Anderson dismissed a federal lawsuit against James Dolan, the owner of the New York Knicks and New York Rangers. The decision, rendered in California, marked a significant setback for Kellye Croft, who had filed the lawsuit in mid-January, alleging serious accusations dating back to 2013.
Allegations Against Dolan
Croft's lawsuit outlined severe allegations of sexual assault and sex trafficking against Dolan, claiming that while his band was on tour with The Eagles, Dolan sexually assaulted her. Croft alleged that Dolan was "extremely assertive and pressured her into unwanted sexual intercourse," despite her clear objections.
The case took a darker turn with claims that, later in 2013, Croft was flown out to California under the guise of working as a massage therapist. Once there, she alleged she was trafficked by Dolan to "engage in unlawful and unwelcome sex acts."
Connections to Harvey Weinstein
Adding to the gravity of her claims, Croft asserted that Dolan facilitated a meeting between her and convicted sex offender and former movie producer Harvey Weinstein in January 2014, which led to an assault by Weinstein. These chilling accusations were a central component of her lawsuit, seeking justice and accountability.
Judge's Ruling
Judge Anderson's ruling specifically dismissed Croft's sex trafficking allegations with prejudice, barring these charges from being brought up again in the future. However, other claims, including sexual battery against Dolan, sexual assault by Weinstein, and aiding and abetting of sexual assault by Dolan, were dismissed without prejudice. This crucial distinction gives Croft the opportunity to refile those specific claims should she choose to do so.
The court also mandated that Croft pay the defendant's court costs, adding a financial burden to her legal challenges. Croft had initially sought monetary damages and a trial by jury for her claims.
Response from Croft's Attorneys
Reacting to the ruling, Croft's attorneys, Kevin Mintzer and Meredith Firetog, expressed their discontent with the court's decision. "We respectfully disagree with the District Court's decision, which we believe incorrectly interprets the federal sex trafficking law and undermines critically important protections for sex trafficking survivors," they said.
Despite the setback, Croft's legal team remains resolute. "We will be appealing this decision and are confident that the Court of Appeals will correct this injustice. We will also continue to pursue Ms. Croft's sexual battery claims against James Dolan and Harvey Weinstein, which remain unaffected by the [Tuesday's] decision. Our fight for Ms. Croft is just beginning," Mintzer and Firetog added.
This case underscores the complexities and challenges faced by survivors of sexual assault and sex trafficking in seeking justice through the legal system. While the dismissal of some claims represents a significant hurdle, the legal avenues for Croft are not entirely closed. Her attorneys' commitment to appealing the decision and pursuing remaining claims indicates an ongoing battle in the courts.
As the story continues to unfold, it brings to light the broader issues of accountability and protections for victims of sexual crimes, and the legal interpretations that can significantly impact the outcomes of such cases.